Skip to main content

The Lion King



The Lion King is a beautiful live action remake of the 1994 classic from Disney. While it roars resoundingly in certain aspects, it cowers in others.

First and foremost, the movie gives the audience exactly what they’re expecting. The plot is almost exactly the same (I’ll mention the few nugatory changes later) as the original, and the songs are pretty much verbatim; this is unlike Aladdin, for example, in which Disney has incorporated a modern twist to the remake.

The best part about maintaining the storyline is the nostalgia that it invokes in the audience’s minds, especially for those for whom the original is a fond childhood memory. This also creates a unique effect of dramatic irony, where the audience knows what is going to happen, while the characters don’t. The looming future events foreshadow what’s going on in the scene, making certain scenes much more emotionally moving (unlike the first time).

Related image
Courtesy of Walt Disney Pictures
Now, for the one main drawback of the film: the expressions. Recreating the original as a real-life version really loses out in this facet. The animated expressions (pun intended) and characteristic physical features of each of the original characters are missing - Scar’s sly and calculating eyes, or his gaunt face and black mane; Simba’s lively eyes and top tuft of fur; Mufasa’s thick, regal mane; and so on. In fact, in this one, the lions are barely distinguishable. The only difference between Scar and Mufasa is Scar’s slightly darker complexion and his (far from conspicuous) scar. When you think back to the original, you can picture each of the individual characters with ease. This isn’t the case for this one.

Nevertheless, the film is beautiful and very well-made. The visual effects and animation are just impeccable. It’s simply amazing how detailed and sharp the characters are, and how picturesque the landscapes created are. The movie is truly a treat for the eyes.

The only difference in the plot of the original and this one is that the dynamic between the hyenas and Scar has changed a bit. The music has been recreated brilliantly, thanks to Hans Zimmer; the soundtrack retains the essence (and lyrics) of its predecessor.

In conclusion, I definitely think that The Lion King is worth the watch. While it may not be as memorable as the original, it does remain true to it and has a charm of its own.

And, of course, I have to end with the beloved Swahili phrase - Hakuna Matata!

Image result for the lion king 2019
Courtesy of Walt Disney Pictures

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Favourite

I absolutely loved The Favourite . Director Yorgos Lanthimos is truly a genius. All three actresses too - Olivia Colman, Emma Stone and Rachel Weisz - have delivered impeccable performances. The screenplay is written in such a way that the quirks and characteristics of the characters are implicitly conveyed to the audience lucidly. Many scenes were riveting and powerful, and you could see how the characters' actions were justified by strong ulterior motives. This adds a sinister feel to the whole movie, which is amplified by an apt music score (which can be noticed in the trailer as well) in the background. Another unique feature of the film was that it presented in chapters, making it seem like a series of significant events being shown. Furthermore, the cinematography and editing is fantastic. An example of it that I especially liked was that in parts, Lanthimos has superimposed different components of a scene, which are happening concomitantly, over each other, highlig...

Bohemian Rhapsody

Calling all Queen fans! Bohemian Rhapsody is a fitting tribute to legendary performer and the lead singer of the band Queen, Freddie Mercury. The film does a great job in portraying the ups and downs of Mercury's life. The background is always indicative of the mood in the scene. Director Bryan Singer (and Dexter Fletcher who finished the film after Singer was fired midway) recreates Mercury's exuberance on stage and has made sure that the audience experiences it as though they were there. Some of Queen's greatest hits are played intermittently as transitions, making the flow from scene to scene mellifluously smooth. Rami Malek's performance is stunning. He has done extremely well to get into character and portray Mercury's idiosyncrasies and emanate his confidence on stage, and otherwise (not to mention the big fake teeth!). An Oscar-worthy performance perhaps? Now, I'm not here to separate the fact from the fiction. The movie is not the most acc...

Toy Story 4

Toy Story 4 takes Woody, Buzz and the rest of the gang on one final adventure that ultimately leads to a climactic conclusion to the beloved series. While this movie avoids the (very) dark overtone of the previous one, it instead tugs at the audience's heartstrings with emotionally-charged scenes that evoke feelings of nostalgia and sympathy, among others. The comedy is light and character-centric, along the lines of the previous films, with cameos by Keanu Reeves, and Key and Peele adding to the fun. I think that the highlight of the Toy Story movies (in fact, Pixar ones, in general) is the precision of anthropomorphism, a fancy term referring to the attribution of human characteristics to non-human things, especially the flaws. The toys (or cars or monsters or bugs) are so very human. They experience not-so-favorable feelings like jealousy, selfishness and hate, making them so relatable and realistic (figuratively). This is in contrast to the commonly portrayed (an...